Difference between revisions of "Talk:WesnothBinariesLinux"
From The Battle for Wesnoth Wiki
(Comment on removal of the Ubuntu i10n section) |
(Is it convenient to clean some information?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Is it convenient to clean some information? == | ||
| + | * Compile information should not be here | ||
| + | * Vine Linux section is terribly outdated, it just misinforms | ||
| + | * Yoper Linux is dead (http://yoper-linux.org/2012/11/time-to-close-shop/) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bonus: | ||
| + | * It is relevant to maintain openSUSE 11.1 (Dec 2008), openSUSE 11.2 (Nov 2009) information? Why not maintain Ubuntu 8.10, 9.04... information too? I think it is obsolete. | ||
| + | |||
== "International language support" in Ubuntu == | == "International language support" in Ubuntu == | ||
Revision as of 12:31, 21 June 2013
Is it convenient to clean some information?
- Compile information should not be here
- Vine Linux section is terribly outdated, it just misinforms
- Yoper Linux is dead (http://yoper-linux.org/2012/11/time-to-close-shop/)
Bonus:
- It is relevant to maintain openSUSE 11.1 (Dec 2008), openSUSE 11.2 (Nov 2009) information? Why not maintain Ubuntu 8.10, 9.04... information too? I think it is obsolete.
"International language support" in Ubuntu
I commented out this section in r42634. First off, all i10n I've tested in Lucid (1.6) and Natty (1.8) seems to be working fine without intervention. Second, there is no --dummy-locales option after 1.6, as the section claims. Third, I don't know the situation in 1.4, but every Ubuntu release with less than 1.6 in the repository is now firmly EOL.
By all means though, if parts of the section are useful/not incorrect to anyone, please restore them. Naranja 04:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)