Difference between revisions of "GCI/Playtesting/Northern Rebirth/Normal"
From The Battle for Wesnoth Wiki
< GCI | Playtesting
Quasarworld (talk | contribs) (Blanked the page) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Tester:Aurora/Narnian/David Neil | ||
+ | ==01-Breaking the Chains== | ||
+ | '''How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''How clear did you find the scenario objectives?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==02-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==03-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==04-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==05-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==06-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==07-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==08-== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==09-== | ||
+ | ==10-== | ||
+ | ==11-== | ||
+ | ==12-== | ||
+ | ==13-== | ||
+ | ==14-== |
Revision as of 03:42, 7 December 2010
Tester:Aurora/Narnian/David Neil
Contents
01-Breaking the Chains
How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?