Difference between revisions of "Talk:UsefulWMLFragments"
From The Battle for Wesnoth Wiki
m (2 suggestions) |
(→Unbalanced syntax fragments: new section) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm thinking that it would be good to have all pages linked also link back. It would also be good to add this page to the Category: WML, opinions? /tsr | I'm thinking that it would be good to have all pages linked also link back. It would also be good to add this page to the Category: WML, opinions? /tsr | ||
| + | |||
| + | Henkutsu: That is my thoughts too. Also several of the pages are badly outdated. After getting so many errors in my scenarios from old code, I'm now going through the whole thing cleaning it up. I'm adding the links and may move bits to different pages. | ||
| + | An example of the old code is the Random Traits stuff. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Unbalanced syntax fragments == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Don't add macros that generate unbalanced syntax fragments.'' Is this rule really necessary? I find it rather limiting. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:49, 29 October 2013
I'm thinking that it would be good to have all pages linked also link back. It would also be good to add this page to the Category: WML, opinions? /tsr
Henkutsu: That is my thoughts too. Also several of the pages are badly outdated. After getting so many errors in my scenarios from old code, I'm now going through the whole thing cleaning it up. I'm adding the links and may move bits to different pages. An example of the old code is the Random Traits stuff.
Unbalanced syntax fragments
Don't add macros that generate unbalanced syntax fragments. Is this rule really necessary? I find it rather limiting.
This page was last edited on 29 October 2013, at 19:49.