Difference between revisions of "User talk:Adamsetzler"
(→Link description improvements: telling him that his edits could get lost soon) |
(moving discussion (2)) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I saw that you did some edits in the last time on [[BuildingScenarios]] and [[BuildingCampaigns]] and changed some link texts. I don't want to discuss here where that is useful and where it isn't - admittedly I don't think all of your changes are improvements - but I wanted to tell you that we (meaning: [[user:monochromatic|monochromatic]] and me) are currently discussing a whole structure change on this wiki. Since I don't want you to waste your time making edits which will maybe be just ignored in a not so distant future, I wanted to warn you. ;)<br> | I saw that you did some edits in the last time on [[BuildingScenarios]] and [[BuildingCampaigns]] and changed some link texts. I don't want to discuss here where that is useful and where it isn't - admittedly I don't think all of your changes are improvements - but I wanted to tell you that we (meaning: [[user:monochromatic|monochromatic]] and me) are currently discussing a whole structure change on this wiki. Since I don't want you to waste your time making edits which will maybe be just ignored in a not so distant future, I wanted to warn you. ;)<br> | ||
Nevertheless thank you for your help. We will need some people who are eager to help us with our editing. If you would like to help us out, please inform us (for example by replying to this message). Your help would be greatly appreciated then; only now it's unfortunately a bit redundant. --[[User:Crendgrim|Crendgrim]] 18:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | Nevertheless thank you for your help. We will need some people who are eager to help us with our editing. If you would like to help us out, please inform us (for example by replying to this message). Your help would be greatly appreciated then; only now it's unfortunately a bit redundant. --[[User:Crendgrim|Crendgrim]] 18:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think linking texts like BuildingCampaignsSimple, BuildingCampaignsIntermediate and BuildingCampaignsAdvanced look unprofessional. Furthermore, I'm interested in what you admittedly don't consider an improvement, since otherwise your message sounds snobbish. | ||
| + | : | ||
| + | :From the looks of it, if you had sent any messages with that tone to other editors, perhaps that is why the wiki looks like an AOL user put it together, since criticism without critique is nothing more than an arbitrary insult. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[User:Adamsetzler|Adamsetzler]] 19:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:03, 10 May 2011
Link description Improvements
Hi Adamsetzler!
I saw that you did some edits in the last time on BuildingScenarios and BuildingCampaigns and changed some link texts. I don't want to discuss here where that is useful and where it isn't - admittedly I don't think all of your changes are improvements - but I wanted to tell you that we (meaning: monochromatic and me) are currently discussing a whole structure change on this wiki. Since I don't want you to waste your time making edits which will maybe be just ignored in a not so distant future, I wanted to warn you. ;)
Nevertheless thank you for your help. We will need some people who are eager to help us with our editing. If you would like to help us out, please inform us (for example by replying to this message). Your help would be greatly appreciated then; only now it's unfortunately a bit redundant. --Crendgrim 18:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- I think linking texts like BuildingCampaignsSimple, BuildingCampaignsIntermediate and BuildingCampaignsAdvanced look unprofessional. Furthermore, I'm interested in what you admittedly don't consider an improvement, since otherwise your message sounds snobbish.
- From the looks of it, if you had sent any messages with that tone to other editors, perhaps that is why the wiki looks like an AOL user put it together, since criticism without critique is nothing more than an arbitrary insult.
- Adamsetzler 19:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC)