Difference between revisions of "Talk:ReferenceWMLDump"

From The Battle for Wesnoth Wiki
(Therefore my claim (that 1.1.5 eliminated simple substitution) was incorrrect.)
(a comment and a question)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
: When I made a copy of 2p - Blitz with this event, side 1 was able to recruit Elvish Sharpshooters.
 
: When I made a copy of 2p - Blitz with this event, side 1 was able to recruit Elvish Sharpshooters.
  
: To show why your test failed, I suggest that "$foo_$b" is not a valid complex suggestion. (I do not know why "$foo_$b" does not work; maybe there is a bug in 1.2.5, or I misunderstand how complex substitution works.) The wiki page claims that [message]message= allows complex substitution, so I extended your example to be:
+
: To show why your test failed, I suggest that "$foo_$b" is not a valid complex suggestion. (I do not know why "$foo_$b" does not work; maybe there is a bug in 1.2.5, or I misunderstand how complex substitution works.)  
 +
 
 +
:: But if this is not a valid expression, how can it be correctly interpreted by [set_variable]format=, which after all does complex substitution, too? [[User:Meriton|Meriton]] 22:17, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
: The wiki page claims that [message]message= allows complex substitution, so I extended your example to be:
  
 
  {VARIABLE foo_bar 42}
 
  {VARIABLE foo_bar 42}
Line 59: Line 63:
  
 
: I have to admit that my previous claim (" Since Wesnoth 1.1.5, all simple substitution was eliminated in favor of complex substitution, which is more versatile.") was incorrect, because of the above description of how Wesnoth sometimes does "switch back to simple substitution". --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 22:00, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
 
: I have to admit that my previous claim (" Since Wesnoth 1.1.5, all simple substitution was eliminated in favor of complex substitution, which is more versatile.") was incorrect, because of the above description of how Wesnoth sometimes does "switch back to simple substitution". --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 22:00, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
Let me see if I got this right: In theory, all attributes that perform any substitution perform complex substitution, but due to a bug, complex substitution sometimes does simple substitution instead. We therefore tell users that only simple substitution is performed in the stable branch, because that is the only thing that is guaranteed to work. [[User:Meriton|Meriton]] 22:17, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 20:17, 15 July 2007

Kernigh wrote:

Since Wesnoth 1.1.5, all simple substitution was eliminated in favor of complex substitution, which is more versatile.

There is no source for this claim, and my tests contradict it: In wesnoth 1.2.5, the WML snippet

			{VARIABLE foo_bar 42}
			{VARIABLE b bar}
			[gold]
				side=1
				amount=$foo_$b
			[/gold]

does nothing, but

			{VARIABLE foo_bar 42}
			{VARIABLE b bar}
			{VARIABLE_OP temp format $foo_$b}
			[gold]
				side=1
				amount=$temp
			[/gold]

adds 42 gold to side 1. I have therefore reverted the edit. Please only change the content of this page if you are sure you are right.

Meriton 15:25, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

In the source file wesnoth-1.2.5/changelog, under the section for "Wesnoth 1.1.5", it states, "all [event] tags shall perform complex substitution".
Further, the following example passes wesnoth 1.2.5, and at least demonstrates that the [allow_recruit]type= key permits complex substitution:
			# works in 1.2.5
			[event]
				name=start
				{VARIABLE title "Sharpshooter"}
				{VARIABLE name title}
				[allow_recruit]
					type="Elvish $$name||"
					side=1
				[/allow_recruit]
			[/event]
When I made a copy of 2p - Blitz with this event, side 1 was able to recruit Elvish Sharpshooters.
To show why your test failed, I suggest that "$foo_$b" is not a valid complex suggestion. (I do not know why "$foo_$b" does not work; maybe there is a bug in 1.2.5, or I misunderstand how complex substitution works.)
But if this is not a valid expression, how can it be correctly interpreted by [set_variable]format=, which after all does complex substitution, too? Meriton 22:17, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
The wiki page claims that [message]message= allows complex substitution, so I extended your example to be:
			{VARIABLE foo_bar 42}
			{VARIABLE b bar}
			[gold]
				side=2
				amount=$foo_$b
				# broken in 1.2.5
			[/gold]

			[message]
				speaker=narrator
				message=$foo_$b
				# broken in 1.2.5
			[/message]
When I tested this, side 2 failed to gain 42 gold, and the message box can up with an empty message! --Kernigh 16:35, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

There is a bug with complex substitution in the stable branch; it the value starts with '$' as the very first character then it will (sometimes) switch back to simple substitution. This bug was fixed by eliminating simple substitution in the development branch. As a workaround, you can put a space as the first charatcer in the message, like this: message=" $foo_$b". --unsigned talk from Sapient

I have to admit that my previous claim (" Since Wesnoth 1.1.5, all simple substitution was eliminated in favor of complex substitution, which is more versatile.") was incorrect, because of the above description of how Wesnoth sometimes does "switch back to simple substitution". --Kernigh 22:00, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

Let me see if I got this right: In theory, all attributes that perform any substitution perform complex substitution, but due to a bug, complex substitution sometimes does simple substitution instead. We therefore tell users that only simple substitution is performed in the stable branch, because that is the only thing that is guaranteed to work. Meriton 22:17, 15 July 2007 (CEST)