Difference between revisions of "Sandbox"

From The Battle for Wesnoth Wiki
(Section: 007)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The sandbox is for editing experiments. If you are already logged in, click on the "Edit" link above to experiment yourself!
 
The sandbox is for editing experiments. If you are already logged in, click on the "Edit" link above to experiment yourself!
  
== Section ==
+
'''Bold text'''== Section ==
  
 
=== Subsection ===
 
=== Subsection ===
Line 9: Line 9:
 
*** more stars means deeper levels
 
*** more stars means deeper levels
  
==== Sub-subsection ====
+
==== Sub-subsection ===='''Bold text''''''Bold text'''''Italic text''[[Link title]][http://www.example.com link title]
 +
== Headline text ==[[Image:Example.jpg]][[Media:Example.ogg]]<math>Insert formula here</math><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>--[[User:Red lances|Red lances]] 16:36, 8 June 2006 (CEST)
 +
----
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
# Numbered lists are also good
 
# Numbered lists are also good

Revision as of 14:36, 8 June 2006

The sandbox is for editing experiments. If you are already logged in, click on the "Edit" link above to experiment yourself!

Bold text== Section ==

Subsection

  • Lists are easy to do:
    • start every line with a star
      • more stars means deeper levels

==== Sub-subsection ===='Bold text'Bold textItalic textLink titlelink title == Headline text ==File:Example.jpgMedia:Example.ogg<math>Insert formula here</math>Insert non-formatted text here--Red lances 16:36, 8 June 2006 (CEST)



  1. Numbered lists are also good
    1. very organized
    2. easy to follow
      1. yeah
        1. wow
          1. how far
            1. can u go?
                                                                                                                  1. lol.
you can have sub-sub-sections

yes, this is a test

and sub-sub-sub-sections

I'm seeing how many sub-s you can get

=but not sub-sub-sub-sub-sections=

apparently 3 is the maximum.

but I'm not sure, because an edit button does appear when you try to make a sub-sub-sub-sub-section... maybe it interprets it as being a sub-sub-sub-section?

  1. now lets try the same with lists
    1. two
      1. three
        1. four
          1. this is fun
            1. lets try it now
              1. how deep can we get?
                1. nine
                  1. ten
                    1. this is rather high
                      1. will it ever stop?
                        1. I don't think so
                          1. its not like the sub-sections
                            1. which do stop
                              1. sixteen; and that's the last one that it allows

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Testing, this should be an new page? The_new_sandbox