GCI/Playtesting/Liberty/Easy

WORK IN PROGRESS

Preamble

http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting

For reference purposes:

1. What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
2. How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
3. How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
4. How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
5. What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
6. How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
7. What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
8. Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
9. If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?

Scenario 1: The Raid

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
2. Difficulty level: 2. Not too difficult, especially since the villagers in the town help out once the raiders get near.
3. Mostly clear objectives. The leader charging straight at the village caught be by surprise, although in retrospective, I should paid more attention to the instructions.
4. Very interesting story, especially the introduction. I am left wondering how they'll attempt to obtain liberty.
5. No major challenges.
6. Fun: 4. Although there is not much to say at this point.
7. No changes needed.
8. None.
9. I thought the WML was very well commented, I could understand the intention of each block of code with a quick browse.

Scenario 2: Civil Disobedience

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
2. Difficulty: 3-4.
3. Objectives were clear.
4. The story is interesting and fits well with what has been established so far.
5. No major challenges.
6. Fun: 5.
7. No changes needed.
8. None.
9. Very well commented code.

Scenario 3: A Strategy of Hope

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
2. Difficulty: 3. Slightly too easy.
3. Very clear objectives.
4. Storyline was clear, although I don't remember a character named Fal Khag.
5. No significant challenges.
6. Fun: 4.
7. The system for giving your ally orders, although interesting, needs some improvement; the options for commands given seemed unintuitive, I could not tell whether telling it to defend means that it protects my base or my leader (I expected the former, but my ally seemed to be trying for the latter). Also, the difficulty of this scenario seems to be too easy, I expected more of a challenge at this point.
8. None.
9. Looks good.

Scenario 4: Unlawful Orders

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
2. Difficulty: 4-5. Still easier than I'd expect at this level.
3. Objectives very clear.
4. The storyline was very interesting and engaging. I did not expect the enemy's sudden transformation into undead, and I'm curious as to who inflicted this "curse" on them. Still no mention of this Fal Khag character, this might be a bug.
5. No major challenges.
6. Fun: 6.
7. No changes needed.
8. None.
9. The WML was clear up to the Special event where the enemies changed to undead. There are several blocks of nested "if...else" structures and it became difficult to discern what each block was testing without reading deeply into the code. I would suggest adding comments in-line with each block to clarify this.

Scenario 5: Hide and Seek

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.

Scenario 6: The Grey Woods

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.

Scenario 7: The Hunters

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.

Scenario 8: Glory

1. Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.