Difference between revisions of "GCI/Playtesting/An Orcish Incursion/Beginner"
From The Battle for Wesnoth Wiki
< GCI | Playtesting
(→Scenario 1: Defend the forests: test results scenario1) |
m (→Scenario 1: Defend the forests: adjustment and added suggestion) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | == Scenario 1: Defend the | + | == Scenario 1: Defend the Forests == |
#Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2. | #Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
#Good. The introduction provides a good understanding of the setting which this campaign takes place in, even for someone who is not familiar with the history of Wesnoth. | #Good. The introduction provides a good understanding of the setting which this campaign takes place in, even for someone who is not familiar with the history of Wesnoth. | ||
#No challenges to meeting objectives. | #No challenges to meeting objectives. | ||
| − | #Fun: | + | #Fun: 3. The Scenario is pretty mundane. |
| − | # | + | #I have not tried the map editor so I am unsure of the feasibility of this, but perhaps the map could be slightly enlarged. The playing field felt slightly cramped. |
#No events caused me to lose or restart the scenario. | #No events caused me to lose or restart the scenario. | ||
#Although I don't know WML specifically I know HTML and have a general understanding of markup languages. The WML appears fairly intuitive and cleanly written on a quick glance. | #Although I don't know WML specifically I know HTML and have a general understanding of markup languages. The WML appears fairly intuitive and cleanly written on a quick glance. | ||
Revision as of 04:27, 24 November 2010
Contents
WORK IN PROGRESS
For reference:
- What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
- How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
- How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
- How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
- What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
- How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
- What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
- Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
- If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?
Scenario 1: Defend the Forests
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
- Challenge level: 3 reasonably easy; this level is expected in the first scenario.
- Very clear scenario objectives.
- Good. The introduction provides a good understanding of the setting which this campaign takes place in, even for someone who is not familiar with the history of Wesnoth.
- No challenges to meeting objectives.
- Fun: 3. The Scenario is pretty mundane.
- I have not tried the map editor so I am unsure of the feasibility of this, but perhaps the map could be slightly enlarged. The playing field felt slightly cramped.
- No events caused me to lose or restart the scenario.
- Although I don't know WML specifically I know HTML and have a general understanding of markup languages. The WML appears fairly intuitive and cleanly written on a quick glance.
Scenario 2: Assassins
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
Scenario 3: Wasteland
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
Scenario 4: Valley of Trolls
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
Scenario 5: Linaera the Quick
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
Scenario 6: A Detour Through the Swamp
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
Scenario 7: Showdown
- Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.