GSoC-SpriteSheets Gabba

This page is related to Summer of Code 2010

See the list of Summer of Code 2010 Ideas

This is a Summer of Code 2010 student page

Description

Gabba - Sprite Sheets

I have a pretty concrete proposal of how I'd implement the idea from http://wiki.wesnoth.org/SoC_Ideas_SpriteSheets Details inside!

About Me

See http://wiki.wesnoth.org/User:Gabba.

Project

The general idea of this project is to introduce sprite sheets and their memory, loading time and disk space benefits, while disturbing the workflow of artists as little as possible. They shouldn't need to go through any more hassles than now to keep contributing.

How I'll achieve this is by introducing a distinction between source material (what artists work with) and generated material (what the game engine actually uses). Note that the differences between the two will be small enough that the game engine will still be able to run using source material directly, as if sprite sheets had never been added.

Source material

• Keep individual pngs on svn. Makes it easier for artists. If some artists prefer to work directly with spritesheets, no problem, I'll accept that as input as well, by taking them apart and treating them as a set of individual images.
• Keep WML .cfg files for unit animations as they are now, i.e. have them refer to individual .png files. (Artists can instead use a part of their own sprite sheet through the already implemented ~CROP() functor.) Makes it easier to create animations and see what are the frames of an animation.

Generated material

Optimized sprite sheets will be generated as part of the wesnoth build process, and new WML animation files will be produced, which are identical to the source ones, except for image data which now refers to the correct location within sprite sheets. This will be done with a single, highly configurable command-line tool based on the ClanLib texture packer, that gets called from the current build scripts (scons, cmake, autoconf).

The new tool will work by following those steps:

1. Take command line parameters:
   • A number of existing WML (.cfg) animation files as input (could be a whole directory, a set of directories, individual files, whatever)
   • A target sprite sheet size, for instance 512x512 (optimal size probably depends on target platform memory capabilities)
2. Extract the list of image locations from those WML files
   • If some image locations are actually references (through ~CROP) to part of a hand-made sprite sheet, each individual reference will be treated as an individual image in the following steps
3. Use the image list to build sprite sheets of the size specified, cramming as many images as possible into each one using a bin-packing algorithm
4. Output copies of the original WML files, updating the image references to point to the proper location within my sprite sheets.

There are several design choices to make here:

• do we mix all sprites from official content together? (Best for disk space, but wastes memory as you may load a whole sheet for a single image.)
• do we do per-campaign/per-faction sprite sheets? (Probably best for memory, still ok on disk space, and we're forced to do this for non-mainline content)
• we should probably allow a mix of both and let the packagers enter a set of directories with WML animation descriptions, and out come the corresponding sprite sheets.

When distributing the game (except in source form), we'd include only spritesheets and the generated .cfg files, not original .png or .cfg files.

• This said, we could consider doing an "artist distribution" of the game, that includes the unprocessed images and WML files, so they can browse this material in a more friendly format, without having to use svn. I would also give them a better idea of the preferred format in which to submit their work.

The tool

As far as generating the sprite sheets themselves, I'll borrow a maximum of code from the program below (licence is BSD) and adapt their GUI for testing and to complement the automated process:

ClanLib texture packer

   http://www.rtsoft.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2518
   http://www.clanlib.org/beta/index.php/Examples#Screenshots_from_ClanLib-2.0.2FUtilities

• This program takes .png with transparency as input and output, so no problem there.
• I'll modify the GUI and especially provide a command-line interface, to allow integration with the build process. Unless there's a very good case for introducing a new dependency, the modified program won't add any new dependencies to Wesnoth or its build process.
• The program currently outputs XML with info of where individual images ended up in the sprite sheets; I'll adapt this code to output modified WML .cfg files, as explained above.

Note: before picking the ClanLib tool as the base for my work, I evaluated the following ones:

   http://spritesheetpacker.codeplex.com/
   http://www.imagemagick.org/script/montage.php
   BlitzBasic ImagePacker - http://www.blitzbasic.com/Community/posts.php?topic=30518
   http://slick.cokeandcode.com/demos/packer.jnlp
   http://homepage.ntlworld.com/config/imagepacker/

The algorithm(s)

Once all the above is done, I'll spend any remaining time trying to improve the placement of images in the sprite sheets, which may seem to be nitpicking but could get crucial for low-memory devices. Misc research links about this:

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_packing_problem
   http://code.google.com/p/caparf/
   http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Packing+Rectangular+Pieces+-+A+Heuristic+Approach.%22

Artists' workflow

So, how would implementing this system affect how artists work now? In short: not at all, as you can see below:

Concrete example from the drake glider (Glider.cfg):

• What it'll look like on svn (i.e., same as now):

  [attack_anim]
      (...)
       [frame]
           duration=100
           image="units/drakes/glider-kick-1.png"
       [/frame]
      (...)
  [/attack_anim]

• What it'll look like after processing through my system, and therefore in your packaged copy of the game:

  [attack_anim]
      (...)
       [frame]
           duration=100
           image="units/drakes/drakes_sprite_sheet.png~CROP(0,0,20,20)"
       [/frame]
      (...)
  [/attack_anim]

• What an artist can change it to (in either the svn source or the packaged version she downloaded from the http://www.wesnoth.org/ front page) in order to test a new image:

  [attack_anim]
      (...)
       [frame]
           duration=100
           image="units/drakes/My_New_Fancy_Glider_Kick_1.png"
       [/frame]
      (...)
  [/attack_anim]

• Or she could use this, too, to refer to her own image sheet or strip (this is already possible):

  [attack_anim]
      (...)
       [frame]
           duration=100
           image="MY_OWN_SPRITE_SHEET.png~CROP(10,10,30,30)"
       [/frame]
      (...)
  [/attack_anim]

Milestones and Calendar

Before GSoC, poke a bit more inside the code of ClanLib Texture Packer, and continue to evaluate alternate candidates. Do a few spritesheet tests to try and locate problems that could affect this project. GSoC start according to Google's calendar: May 24

• Add a command line interface to the ClanLib app, and test generations of sets of spritesheets of various sizes, using a list of image folders as input. Discuss design issues for the following milestones.
  • Deadline: June 7
• Integrate parsing of WML files with animation data to harvest the list of images (and parts of images) to use as input. Adapt the ClanLib app's current interface to my testing needs.
  • Deadline: June 21
• Output updated WML files with the new location of images within spritesheets.
  • Deadline: July 5
• Start integration of the tool with the Wesnoth build process.
  • Deadline: July 16 (Mid-term evaluation)
• Finish integration with the build process, do final adjustments to UI, do memory benchmarks and resolve caching issues, document stuff
  • Deadline: August 9
• If things go faster than planned, implement various bin-packing algorithms to try and do even better than the clanlib texture packer. Test them with various spritesheet sizes and various sets of images.