Talk:StartingPoints - Revision history

Shadowm: Shadowmaster moved page Talk:Main Page to Talk:StartingPoints over redirect: Undo that mess, it was a bad idea

2013-10-16T03:07:10Z

Shadowmaster moved page Talk:Main Page to Talk:StartingPoints over redirect: Undo that mess, it was a bad idea

Shadowm: Shadowmaster moved page Talk:StartingPoints to Talk:Main Page: This is the actual MW Main_Page, which is special; doing this eliminates a superfluous redirect on http://wiki.wesnoth.org/

2013-10-16T02:06:40Z

Shadowmaster moved page Talk:StartingPoints to Talk:Main Page: This is the actual MW Main_Page, which is special; doing this eliminates a superfluous redirect on http://wiki.wesnoth.org/

Ivanovic: Talk:Site Map moved to Talk:StartingPoints: The name "Site Map" was missleading...

2007-07-01T21:56:41Z

Talk:Site Map moved to Talk:StartingPoints: The name "Site Map" was missleading...

Jorda: Talk:HomePage moved to Talk:Site Map

2005-10-16T07:29:28Z

Talk:HomePage moved to Talk:Site Map

Scott at 13:55, 9 September 2005

2005-09-09T13:55:59Z

Allefant: /* Narrow edit box in glamdrol skin */

2005-08-20T20:43:50Z

‎Narrow edit box in glamdrol skin

Jorda: /* Narrow edit box in glamdrol skin */

2005-08-20T20:15:24Z

‎Narrow edit box in glamdrol skin

Jorda at 20:12, 20 August 2005

2005-08-20T20:12:09Z

Allefant at 22:05, 18 August 2005

2005-08-18T22:05:55Z

Allefant: shortened link

2005-08-18T19:37:51Z

shortened link

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 9 September 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I have no idea what load it puts on the server, so it may be a bad idea - but picture upload would be nice. I could have made the above one display as a thumbnail then :) And I can also think of some other pages where screenshots might be nice. And in the GraphicLibrary, could replace dead links.		I have no idea what load it puts on the server, so it may be a bad idea - but picture upload would be nice. I could have made the above one display as a thumbnail then :) And I can also think of some other pages where screenshots might be nice. And in the GraphicLibrary, could replace dead links.
		+
		+	== Heading/subheading Layout ==
		+
		+	I wanted to see what it would look like going from L3 to L4 on the subheadings. Although it is a logical break (not using the next available heading level), I thought the subheadings looked too much like the section headings. Feel free to change it back, but I think it looks better now. --[[User:Scott\|Scott]] 15:55, 9 September 2005 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 20 August 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::: It would be good to have a larger screen to fix this... Anyway, can you tell if it is better if you use Ctrl++? Does it scale? --[[User:Jorda\|Jorda]] 22:15, 20 August 2005 (CEST)		::: It would be good to have a larger screen to fix this... Anyway, can you tell if it is better if you use Ctrl++? Does it scale? --[[User:Jorda\|Jorda]] 22:15, 20 August 2005 (CEST)
		+
		+	:::: Yes, it does scale with Ctrl++. Still, with the monobook theme, it works as it should without Ctrl++. But I think I see the problem.. the border is not defined just for the edit box, but this skin makes the whole page have those borders :/ Now, personally, I see no reason why someone would use a big window to view the wiki and then have big empty borders - but, in case this is part of the skin's design, I will now just stay with monobook. I can try to submit a small CSS change to the monobook skin so that it displays a Wesnoth icon and the links from the top-bar. --[[User:Allefant\|Allefant]] 22:43, 20 August 2005 (CEST)

	== Missing icon in monobook theme ==		== Missing icon in monobook theme ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 20 August 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:: Sure, it's below. Browser is Firefox 1.0.6. [http://www.nongnu.org/campgen/data/Screenshot.png Screenshot].		:: Sure, it's below. Browser is Firefox 1.0.6. [http://www.nongnu.org/campgen/data/Screenshot.png Screenshot].
		+
		+	::: It would be good to have a larger screen to fix this... Anyway, can you tell if it is better if you use Ctrl++? Does it scale? --[[User:Jorda\|Jorda]] 22:15, 20 August 2005 (CEST)

	== Missing icon in monobook theme ==		== Missing icon in monobook theme ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Narrow edit box in glamdrum skin ==
+== Narrow edit box in glamdrol skin ==
 I was editing some pages before, and somehow it felt extremely cumbersome. Then I went to  wikipedia, and there it felt normal again. The reason I discovered is simple: Here, the edit box is only a tine little box in the middle of the page with a huge border left and right, while on wikipedia it always adjusts to use the full width. (Here it has less than 50%.) Can you change this? Maybe could make it honor the preferences checkbox "edit box has full width", as well as the "edit cols" - both are ignored by the default theme.
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 : It uses 100% of the size here. What browser/resolution are you using? Can you take a screenshot? --[[User:Jorda|Jorda]] 20:46, 16 August 2005 (CEST)
-:: Sure, it's below. Browser is Firefox 1.0.6.
+:: Sure, it's below. Browser is Firefox 1.0.6. [http://www.nongnu.org/campgen/data/Screenshot.png Screenshot].
 == Missing icon in monobook theme ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Theme problems ==
+== Narrow edit box in glamdrum skin ==
 I was editing some pages before, and somehow it felt extremely cumbersome. Then I went to  wikipedia, and there it felt normal again. The reason I discovered is simple: Here, the edit box is only a tine little box in the middle of the page with a huge border left and right, while on wikipedia it always adjusts to use the full width. (Here it has less than 50%.) Can you change this? Maybe could make it honor the preferences checkbox "edit box has full width", as well as the "edit cols" - both are ignored by the default theme.
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 http://www.nongnu.org/campgen/data/Screenshot.png
-If I switch to monobook theme, this problem is solved. But maybe there should be a small wesnoth icon the the corner instead of a big empty space? :) (And I like the glamdrum skin more, just has some usability problems yet for me)
+== Missing icon in monobook theme ==

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:07, 16 October 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:06, 16 October 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:56, 1 July 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:29, 16 October 2005
(No difference)