Talk:ReferencePythonAPI - Revision history

Allefant: Archived all outdated feature requests into the history

2006-07-30T13:53:08Z

Archived all outdated feature requests into the history

Allefant: clened up old discussion

2006-05-24T11:22:25Z

clened up old discussion

Allefant: /* How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other? */

2006-05-16T19:37:30Z

‎How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other?

Allefant: /* How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other? */

2006-05-16T19:37:18Z

‎How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other?

Irrevenant: How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other?

2006-05-15T07:54:26Z

How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other?

Viorc: /* Information Requests */

2006-03-15T02:55:08Z

‎Information Requests

Viorc: /* Feature Requests */

2006-03-15T02:52:09Z

‎Feature Requests

Viorc: /* Information Requests */

2006-03-15T02:51:14Z

‎Information Requests

Viorc at 03:03, 14 March 2006

2006-03-14T03:03:46Z

Viorc: /* Feature Requests */

2006-03-10T00:40:45Z

‎Feature Requests

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 30 July 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~== Feature Requests ==~~

−	~~== chance to kill ==~~
−
−	Can I get a chance_to_kill(wesnoth.location)? And it would tell me the chance to kill the unit at the given location, using terrain modifiers and everything.. I assume, the C++ AI has something like it available. [[User:Allefant\|Allefant]] 22:39, 10 January 2006 (CET)
−
−	~~:I'll check what the C++ has, and export it. [[User:Ryo\|Ryo]] 09:24, 11 January 2006 (CET)~~
−
−	~~:Ok, there is a structure/function associated, <code>attack_analysis</code>. Gonna try to export it, but may be a mess :)~~
−	~~:[[User:Ryo\|Ryo]] 11:29, 15 January 2006 (CET)~~
−
−	~~== usage pattern ==~~
−
−	I'm not sure it would be really useful, since a good AI would probably derive the usage of a unit out of its properties - but maybe there could be a way to query the usage pattern of a unit? Like "scout" or "fighter".. --[[User:Allefant\|Allefant]] 22:35, 13 January 2006 (CET)
−
−	~~== How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other? ==~~
−
−	~~Like the subject line says. Or is this limited to one Python AI at a time? :( --[[User:Irrevenant\|Irrevenant]] 09:54, 15 May 2006 (CEST)~~
−
−	~~No, you can assign AIs at will, for example:~~
−
−	~~<code>~~
−	wesnoth --multiplayer --scenario=multiplayer_Blitz --controller1=ai --algorithm1=python_ai --parm1=python_script:py/ai1.py --side1=Rebels --controller2=ai --algorithm2=python_ai --parm2=python_script:py/ai2.py --side2=Northerners
−	~~</code>~~
−
−	~~This should play Blitz, with first player using py/ai1.py, and second py/ai2.py. --[[User:Allefant\|Allefant]] 21:37, 16 May 2006 (CEST)~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Feature Requests ==
 == chance to kill ==
@@ Line 29: / Line 13: @@
 I'm not sure it would be really useful, since a good AI would probably derive the usage of a unit out of its properties - but maybe there could be a way to query the usage pattern of a unit? Like "scout" or "fighter".. --[[User:Allefant|Allefant]] 22:35, 13 January 2006 (CET)
 == How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other? ==
@@ Line 78: / Line 18: @@
 Like the subject line says.  Or is this limited to one Python AI at a time? :( --[[User:Irrevenant|Irrevenant]] 09:54, 15 May 2006 (CEST)
-No, you can assign AIs as will, for example:
+No, you can assign AIs at will, for example:
 <code>

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 Like the subject line says.  Or is this limited to one Python AI at a time? :( --[[User:Irrevenant|Irrevenant]] 09:54, 15 May 2006 (CEST)
-No, you can assign AIs at will, for example:
+No, you can assign AIs as will, for example:
 <code>

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 16 May 2006
Line 77:		Line 77:

	Like the subject line says. Or is this limited to one Python AI at a time? :( --[[User:Irrevenant\|Irrevenant]] 09:54, 15 May 2006 (CEST)		Like the subject line says. Or is this limited to one Python AI at a time? :( --[[User:Irrevenant\|Irrevenant]] 09:54, 15 May 2006 (CEST)
		+
		+	No, you can assign AIs at will, for example:
		+
		+	<code>
		+	wesnoth --multiplayer --scenario=multiplayer_Blitz --controller1=ai --algorithm1=python_ai --parm1=python_script:py/ai1.py --side1=Rebels --controller2=ai --algorithm2=python_ai --parm2=python_script:py/ai2.py --side2=Northerners
		+	</code>
		+
		+	This should play Blitz, with first player using py/ai1.py, and second py/ai2.py. --[[User:Allefant\|Allefant]] 21:37, 16 May 2006 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:54, 15 May 2006
Line 73:		Line 73:
	* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)		* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)
	: It seems there is already a fix around this function in the svn version. I will try to move to it to check if this problem is still relevant. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 03:55, 15 March 2006 (CET)		: It seems there is already a fix around this function in the svn version. I will try to move to it to check if this problem is still relevant. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 03:55, 15 March 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	== How would you pit two different Python AIs against each other? ==
		+
		+	Like the subject line says. Or is this limited to one Python AI at a time? :( --[[User:Irrevenant\|Irrevenant]] 09:54, 15 May 2006 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 15 March 2006
Line 72:		Line 72:

	* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)		* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)
		+	: It seems there is already a fix around this function in the svn version. I will try to move to it to check if this problem is still relevant. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 03:55, 15 March 2006 (CET)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :added ''hitpoints'', ''max_hitpoints'' and ''poisoned'', thanks for the patch :)
 :[[User:Ryo|Ryo]] 22:22, 2 March 2006 (CET)
 == chance to kill ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 15 March 2006
Line 69:		Line 69:

	== Information Requests ==		== Information Requests ==
		+
		+	* How to get new versions of the API ?
		+	: I have figured out that it is in the "trunk" branch not available through viewcvs. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 03:51, 15 March 2006 (CET)

	* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)		* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 14 March 2006
Line 67:		Line 67:
	:I'll check how to enforce the same rules than for players.		:I'll check how to enforce the same rules than for players.
	:[[User:Ryo\|Ryo]] 22:29, 2 March 2006 (CET)		:[[User:Ryo\|Ryo]] 22:29, 2 March 2006 (CET)
		+
		+	== Information Requests ==
		+
		+	* I have created a page [[GetDestinationsByUnitQuestion]] where I describe a question I am having on the function wesnoth.get_destinations_by_units(). Could you check and help me find an explanation to the observed behaviour. Thanks. --[[User:Viorc\|Viorc]] 04:03, 14 March 2006 (CET)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :Yes, you need to grab again the array after moving. What happens is that you get a "snapshot" copy, which isn't updated when you move a unit - thus your "obsolete" copy can contain now invalid destinations. I'm not sure of a fix for that apart getting again the array. [[User:Ryo|Ryo]] 19:44, 8 December 2005 (CET)
-* Having access to the properties 'HP' and 'Poisonned' of a unit. This would allow focussing on already damaged units when attacking and sending low HP units for rest. It could improve dramatically python AI efficiency. [[User:Viorc|Viorc]]
+* Having access to the properties 'HP' and 'Poisonned' of a unit. [[User:Viorc|Viorc]]
 :added ''hitpoints'', ''max_hitpoints'' and ''poisoned'', thanks for the patch :)
 :[[User:Ryo|Ryo]] 22:22, 2 March 2006 (CET)
 == chance to kill ==