GCI/Playtesting/The South Guard/Beginner - Revision history

Aethaeryn: categorizing

2011-03-06T03:03:34Z

categorizing

Dmitrig01: Adding other branch

2010-11-25T00:34:34Z

Adding other branch

Dmitrig01: Fixed formatting

2010-11-24T07:28:52Z

Fixed formatting

Dmitrig01: Fixed formatting

2010-11-24T07:28:14Z

Fixed formatting

Show changes

Dmitrig01 at 07:26, 24 November 2010

2010-11-24T07:26:41Z

Dmitrig01 at 07:26, 24 November 2010

2010-11-24T07:26:35Z

Dmitrig01 at 07:26, 24 November 2010

2010-11-24T07:26:23Z

Crab: Created page with '(to be filled out by playtester)'

2010-11-23T11:57:48Z

Created page with '(to be filled out by playtester)'

New page

(to be filled out by playtester)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 6 March 2011
Line 158:		Line 158:
	# Maybe a tad harder.		# Maybe a tad harder.
	# n/a		# n/a
		+
		+	[[Category: GCI]]

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 # 5
 # In the beginning, the objectives were quite clear, but once I killed the human and undead leaders, they said "an evil force is still present" -- I'm not sure what to do.
-# I liked the dialog. I did notice one grammar thing though: in the beginning, when talking about the Elvish Fighters, it says this: "They have both a sword and a bow and are deadly with both". The first both is unnecessary, and repetitive. I thought the choice between allying and being enemies was interesting. Losing the Elvish army I had initially invested in was quite discouraging, but since I lost anyway, I went back and redid it.
+# I liked the dialog. I did notice one grammar thing though: in the beginning, when talking about the Elvish Fighters, it says this: "They have both a sword and a bow and are deadly with both". The first both is unnecessary, and repetitive. I thought the choice between allying and being enemies was interesting. Losing the Elvish army I had initially invested in was quite discouraging, but since I lost anyway, I went back and redid it. (I then did it again to win allying with the humans).
 # I didn't protect my main characters well enough.
 # I would rate this at a 8 -- it was harder, but more rewarding, and the story seemed richer.
 # After killing the human and first undead leaders, it could have been more clear as to what to do next.
 # Yes -- I didn't protect my main characters well enough. I loaded from autosave and chose to side with the elves instead of humans, and given my investment in elf fighters, this worked out much better.
 '''Scenario 6'''
@@ Line 95: / Line 135: @@
 # This level could have been not quite as hard.
 # After failing initially, I tried going in with my main characters, but that didn't work.
 '''Scenario 9'''

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 # 5
 # In the beginning, the objectives were quite clear, but once I killed the human and undead leaders, they said "an evil force is still present" -- I'm not sure what to do.
-# I liked the dialog. I did notice one grammar thing though: in the beginning, when talking about the Elvish Fighters, it says this: "They have both a sword and a bow and are deadly with both". The first both is unnecessary, and repetitive.
+# I liked the dialog. I did notice one grammar thing though: in the beginning, when talking about the Elvish Fighters, it says this: "They have both a sword and a bow and are deadly with both". The first both is unnecessary, and repetitive. I thought the choice between allying and being enemies was interesting. Losing the Elvish army I had initially invested in was quite discouraging, but since I lost anyway, I went back and redid it.
 # I didn't protect my main characters well enough.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 (9) If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?
-Unfortunately, I don't know WML, so I can't answer the last question.
+Unfortunately, I don't know WML, so I can't answer this question.
-__Scenario 1:__
+Scenario 1:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
-**Scenario 2:**
+Scenario 2:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
-**Scenario 3:**
+Scenario 3:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
-**Scenario 4:**
+Scenario 4:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
-**Scenario 5:**
+Scenario 5:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 (4) I liked the dialog. I did notice one grammar thing though: in the beginning, when talking about the Elvish Fighters, it says this: "They have both a sword and a bow and are deadly with both". The first both is unnecessary, and repetitive.
-I thought the choice between allying and being enemies was interesting. Losing the Elvish army I had initially invested in was quite discouraging, but since I lost anyway, I went back and redid it, and decided to side with the elves.
+I thought the choice between allying and being enemies was interesting. Losing the Elvish army I had initially invested in was quite discouraging, but since I lost anyway, I went back and redid it.
 (5) I didn't protect my main characters well enough.
@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
-**Scenario 6:**
+Scenario 6:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 87: / Line 87: @@
-**Scenario 7:**
+Scenario 7:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 (8) After failing initially, I tried going in with my main characters, but that didn't work.
-**Scenario 9:**
+Scenario 9:
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
 (2) 2

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Unfortunately, I don't know WML, so I can't answer the last question.
-**Scenario 1:**
+__Scenario 1:__
 (1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:26, 24 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	(to be ~~filled~~ out ~~by playtester~~)	+	Questions to answer:
		+	(1) What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
		+	(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
		+	(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
		+	(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
		+	(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
		+	(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
		+	(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
		+	(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
		+	(9) If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?
		+
		+	Unfortunately, I don't know WML, so I can't answer the last question.
		+
		+	Scenario 1:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) Though I'm a beginner at Wesnoth, I'd give this a 1-2, as it was quite easy for me to win this.
		+	(3) The objectives were quite clear.
		+	(4) The dialog was clear and definitely added to the story.
		+	(5) I didn't really have any major challenges
		+	(6) I would rate this around a 5-6 -- it was pretty fun, and given my novice-ness at the game, it was nice to win :-).
		+	(7) If it would be possible to create some sort of reward (actually, I realized this in the gold bonus, but it could have been more clear) for not creating as many units as I did.
		+	(8) Nope.
		+
		+
		+	Scenario 2:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) Though I'm a beginner at Wesnoth, I'd give this a 1-2, as it was quite easy for me to win this.
		+	(3) It told me I had 9 turns to complete the task, but it also told me I had 40 turns. I found this confusing and wasn't sure which.
		+	(4) I liked how this scenario was broken up into three parts, and that made the story clear and easy-to-follow.
		+	(5) I didn't really have any major challenges.
		+	(6) I would rate this at a 6.
		+	(7) I can't think of anything at the moment.
		+	(8) n/a
		+
		+
		+	Scenario 3:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) 2 -- slightly harder than before, but still quite easyx
		+	(3) It told me I had 9 turns to complete the task, but it also told me I had 40 turns. I found this confusing and wasn't sure which.
		+	(4) I liked how this scenario was broken up into three parts, and that made the story clear and easy-to-follow.
		+	(5) I didn't really have any major challenges.
		+	(6) I would rate this at a 6.
		+	(7) I can't think of anything at the moment.
		+	(8) Nope.
		+
		+
		+	Scenario 4:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) 4 -- it was harder than the previous ones. I like that it's slowly getting harder.
		+	(3) The objectives were very clear.
		+	(4) There was not much dialog, but what was there was good, and the storyline was interesting.
		+	(5) I didn't protect my main characters well enough.
		+	(6) I would rate this at a 7 -- this one was harder than the others, but more rewarding.
		+	(7) I can't think of anything at the moment.
		+	(8) Yes -- I didn't protect my main characters well enough. I loaded from an autosave and played with the knowledge that I would have to protect them better, and won
		+
		+
		+	Scenario 5:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) 5
		+	(3) In the beginning, the objectives were quite clear, but once I killed the human and undead leaders, they said "an evil force is still present" -- I'm not sure what to do.
		+	(4) I liked the dialog. I did notice one grammar thing though: in the beginning, when talking about the Elvish Fighters, it says this: "They have both a sword and a bow and are deadly with both". The first both is unnecessary, and repetitive.
		+
		+	I thought the choice between allying and being enemies was interesting. Losing the Elvish army I had initially invested in was quite discouraging, but since I lost anyway, I went back and redid it, and decided to side with the elves.
		+
		+	(5) I didn't protect my main characters well enough.
		+	(6) I would rate this at a 8 -- it was harder, but more rewarding, and the story seemed richer.
		+	(7) After killing the human and first undead leaders, it could have been more clear as to what to do next.
		+	(8) Yes -- I didn't protect my main characters well enough. I loaded from autosave and chose to side with the elves instead of humans, and given my investment in elf fighters, this worked out much better.
		+
		+
		+	Scenario 6:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) 2 -- much easier.
		+	(3) The objective was clear
		+	(4) The dialog was interesting.
		+	(5) No
		+	(6) I don't think this level was that fun, maybe a 4-5
		+	(7) I don't really think this level was necessary
		+	(8) n/a
		+
		+
		+	Scenario 7:
		+
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) 8 -- I struggled quite a bit with this level.
		+	(3) The objective was clear.
		+	(4) The story was quite interesting, and I certainly didn't expect it.
		+	(5) I didn't play well enough -- I had no idea how to win, and eventually I tried going in with my main characters, but that didn't work either. The final time I tried, I was more careful about the gold, so I could pay the trolls and win.
		+	(6) This level was quite discouraging, so I'd give this a 2-3, especially given how long it took me..
		+	(7) This level could have been not quite as hard.
		+	(8) After failing initially, I tried going in with my main characters, but that didn't work.
		+
		+	Scenario 9:
		+	(1) Beginner difficulty, on 1.9.2.
		+	(2) 2
		+	(3) The objective was very clear.
		+	(4) The dialog and plot were interesting.
		+	(5) They didn't seem at all interested in harming the person I was supposed to be protecting, which made this level very easy.
		+	(6) This was also about 6-7 -- short, easy, quick and a nice finish.
		+	(7) Maybe a tad harder.
		+	(8) n/a