GCI/Playtesting/Liberty/Easy - Revision history

Aethaeryn: categorizing

2011-03-06T03:02:27Z

categorizing

S.Lee94: /* Preamble */ fx link

2010-12-15T02:23:31Z

‎Preamble: fx link

S.Lee94: /* Summary */ update on submitted bugs

2010-12-03T02:36:21Z

‎Summary: update on submitted bugs

S.Lee94: finished analysis

2010-12-03T01:45:08Z

finished analysis

S.Lee94: /* Bugs */ m

2010-12-02T07:04:41Z

‎Bugs: m

S.Lee94: scenario 9 and misc edits

2010-12-02T07:04:24Z

scenario 9 and misc edits

S.Lee94: /* Scenario 8: Glory */ tested scenario 8

2010-12-02T06:48:49Z

‎Scenario 8: Glory: tested scenario 8

S.Lee94: /* Scenario 7: The Hunters */ tested 7

2010-12-02T05:58:27Z

‎Scenario 7: The Hunters: tested 7

S.Lee94: /* Scenario 6: The Grey Woods */ test results of scenario 6

2010-12-01T06:17:25Z

‎Scenario 6: The Grey Woods: test results of scenario 6

S.Lee94: /* Scenario 5: Hide and Seek */ tested scenario

2010-12-01T04:23:53Z

‎Scenario 5: Hide and Seek: tested scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 6 March 2011
Line 125:		Line 125:

	'''Update:''' I've submitted the [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/index.php?title=SpellingMistakes&diff=39299&oldid=38804 spelling/gramatical errors] and [https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?17206 storyline inconsistencies] to their respective pages. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 02:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)		'''Update:''' I've submitted the [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/index.php?title=SpellingMistakes&diff=39299&oldid=38804 spelling/gramatical errors] and [https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?17206 storyline inconsistencies] to their respective pages. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 02:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	[[Category: GCI]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 This is a test of "Liberty" campaign of Wesnoth on Peasant (Easy) difficulty.
-For reference purposes the following has been quoted from [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting the guideline page]:
+For reference purposes the following has been quoted from [[GCI/Playtesting| the guideline page]]:
 <blockquote>
 #What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 3 December 2010
Line 123:		Line 123:
	== Summary ==		== Summary ==
	This campaign appears to be one of the better ones; there is very little that needs to be changed. I found testing it very enjoyable, and I especially liked how the storyline and characters develop. Overall, "Liberty" is an excellent addition to the Wesnoth world. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 01:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)		This campaign appears to be one of the better ones; there is very little that needs to be changed. I found testing it very enjoyable, and I especially liked how the storyline and characters develop. Overall, "Liberty" is an excellent addition to the Wesnoth world. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 01:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	'''Update:''' I've submitted the [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/index.php?title=SpellingMistakes&diff=39299&oldid=38804 spelling/gramatical errors] and [https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?17206 storyline inconsistencies] to their respective pages. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 02:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Preamble ==
-http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting
+For reference purposes the following has been quoted from [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting the guideline page]:
 <blockquote>
 #What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
@@ Line 125: / Line 122: @@
 == Summary ==

@@ Line 122: / Line 122: @@
 === Bugs ===
-#Text typo: There seems to be an extraneous on the last line in Relana's letter.
+#Text typo: There seems to be an extraneous question mark on the last line in Relana's letter.
 == Summary ==

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 #Difficulty: 3. Slightly too easy.
 #Very clear objectives.
-#Storyline was clear, although I don't remember a character named Fal Khag.
+#Storyline was clear.
 #No significant challenges.
 #Fun: 4.
@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 #Difficulty: 4-5. Still easier than I'd expect at this level.
 #Objectives very clear.
-#The storyline was very interesting and engaging. I did not expect the enemy's sudden transformation into undead, and I'm curious as to who inflicted this "curse" on them. Still no mention of this Fal Khag character, this might be a bug.
+#The storyline was very interesting and engaging. I did not expect the enemy's sudden transformation into undead, and I'm curious as to who inflicted this "curse" on them.
 #No major challenges.
 #Fun: 6.
@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 #Looks good, the block of comments in the middle clarifies the random guard placement algorithm a lot.
-'''Bugs:''' The bug tracker seems to be down right now, so I'll report these at a later date.
+=== Bugs ===
 #Dialogue typo: During the dialogue after you see Hans, Baldras says "I haven’t run this much in years. If you were to ask me to infiltrate a heavily guarded city relying on nothing but the cover of darkness and my wits, I would say you were crazy.". The first line has a grammatical error; it should be either "haven't ran this much" or "haven't had to run this much".
 #Inconsistent story bug: When you first meet Hans, he introduces himself and tells you to follow him. Later when you complete the campaign, he says that if they hurry they may be able cross the Grey Woods without any trouble. The problem is that if you go to the sign through the eastern side of the map, it is possible to end up missing the introductory dialogue with Hans. This makes his second comment odd when he appears out of nowhere without introducing himself. I would suggest checking for whether the player has seen the previous dialogue when they reach the sign, and if not have Hans run up to the characters and comment on their speed (or perhaps how they even eluded him) and then continue from there.
@@ Line 117: / Line 118: @@
 #None.
 #Code looks good.
 == Summary ==

@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 #Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
+#Difficulty: 5.
+#Objectives were very clear.
+#Storyline was excellent, a very fitting end to this campaign.
+#None.
+#Fun: 9.
+#No changes needed.
+#None.
+#Code looks good.
 == Summary ==

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 #Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
+#Difficulty: 6.
+#The objectives felt slightly ambiguous. Although it did not affect the gameplay itself, it was disconcerting. I was under the impression, from the introductory dialogue, that I would face waves of enemies and that I would have to weaken or slow them down long enough for the defenders in the nearby castle to set up a defence.
+#Storyline is still interesting.
+#No significant challenges.
+#Fun: 6.
+#No changes needed.
+#None.
+#Looks good. I noticed the easter egg for when a unit steps on fire.
 == Scenario 8: Glory ==

@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
 #Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
+#Difficulty: 8. This is one of the tougher scenarios, although not unexpectedly so.
+#Objectives were clear.
+#Storyline was average and did not stand out.
+#The hardest challenge was the battle with the lich at the end. The impassable terrain and mountains slowed down my units and made attacking him harder.
+#Fun: 3. The fight at the end was frustrating and the overall scenario did not spark much excitement.
+#I don't think there is much that can be done without radically altering the scenario. Perhaps consider adding a couple more lines of dialogue or some special events, or even giving the enemy a wider variety of units -- I only fought one wraith, which the enemy had as a starting unit, and a WC from one of my dead units; the rest were all skeletons  -- so the fighting does not feel as repetitive.
+#Accidentally got Baldras killed during the end battle because I was attacking too aggressively with him.
+#Code is clear.
 == Scenario 7: The Hunters ==

@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 #Peasant (Easy) Difficulty. Version 1.9.2.
+#Difficulty: 6. This difficulty is appropriate.
+#Objectives were clear.
+#Storyline is still very interesting, this scenario added suspense.
+#The largest challenge I found was escaping from the enemy after you they start chasing after you.
+#Fun: 8. I thought this was a unique twist to the gameplay.
+#No changes needed.
+#I almost had to restart after being caught as Harper was going to die but I got lucky and he survived long enough for Baldras to finish off the pursuers.
+#Looks good, the block of comments in the middle clarifies the random guard placement algorithm a lot.
 == Scenario 6: The Grey Woods ==