GCI/Playtesting/Heir to the Throne/Normal - Revision history

Egallager: link cleanup

2023-04-24T02:33:59Z

link cleanup

Aethaeryn: categorizing

2011-03-06T03:01:30Z

categorizing

Bouncy93 at 21:47, 20 December 2010

2010-12-20T21:47:41Z

Show changes

Bouncy93 at 20:51, 20 December 2010

2010-12-20T20:51:53Z

Bouncy93 at 20:48, 20 December 2010

2010-12-20T20:48:03Z

Bouncy93 at 16:15, 18 December 2010

2010-12-18T16:15:45Z

Bouncy93 at 15:49, 18 December 2010

2010-12-18T15:49:50Z

Bouncy93 at 16:01, 17 December 2010

2010-12-17T16:01:19Z

Bouncy93 at 16:03, 12 December 2010

2010-12-12T16:03:48Z

Crab: Created page with '(to be filled out by playtester)'

2010-11-23T14:27:38Z

Created page with '(to be filled out by playtester)'

New page

(to be filled out by playtester)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Google Code-In 2010.
 This page shows the results of testing The Battle for Wesnoth 1.9.2 - campaign "Heir to the Throne" on Normal (Medium) difficulty.
-I followed the guidelines on [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting this page] for the analysis.
+I followed the guidelines on [[GCI/Playtesting|this page]] for the analysis.
 The following has been quoted from the page for reference purposes:

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 6 March 2011
Line 330:		Line 330:

	“Heir to the Throne” is one very good campaign. It was very fun while I was playing it. It has great variety of scenarios with different scenario objectives. It’s very well made, has good storyline and well written dialogs. It has no major bugs or glitches - only small problems mentioned above. It’s not so difficult at all, only few levels hampered me. The campaign makes very good description to the world of Wesnoth and it’s very helpful for novice players.		“Heir to the Throne” is one very good campaign. It was very fun while I was playing it. It has great variety of scenarios with different scenario objectives. It’s very well made, has good storyline and well written dialogs. It has no major bugs or glitches - only small problems mentioned above. It’s not so difficult at all, only few levels hampered me. The campaign makes very good description to the world of Wesnoth and it’s very helpful for novice players.
		+
		+	[[Category: GCI]]

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 #Good dialog.
 #The main challenge was to prevent Moremirmu from dying but everything else was fine.
-#Fun: 7. Very good scenario. It’s very original to search for Moremirmu in the temples.
+#Fun: 7. Very good scenario. It’s very original that you have to search for Moremirmu in the temples.
 #Nothing to change – the scenario is very good.
 #I restarted several times because I didn’t want to loose Moremirmu.

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 #No changes.  Another well made scenario.
 #I restarted once because of hero’s death.
 == Scenario 6: The Siege of Elensefar ==
@@ Line 216: / Line 227: @@
 # No events caused me to lose the game or restart the scenario.
-== Scenario 19 A: Snow Plains  ==
+== Scenario 19A: Snow Plains  ==
 #Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
@@ Line 227: / Line 238: @@
 #No. Everything went right.
-== Scenario 20: Home of the North Elves ==
+== Scenario 19B: Swamp of Dread ==
 #Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
@@ Line 237: / Line 270: @@
 #Hard but fun. No changes needed.
 #No.
 == Scenario 21: The Elven Council==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 18 December 2010
Line 274:		Line 274:
	#Nothing to change. Perfect scenario.		#Nothing to change. Perfect scenario.
	#No events caused me to lose the game or restart the scenario.		#No events caused me to lose the game or restart the scenario.
		+
		+	== Bugs ==
		+
		+	“Heir to the Throne” is very well made campaign. When I was playing it I didn’t find even one bug. I had few problems with the game as a whole, not with the campaign itself.
		+
		+	#Problem in fullscreen mode(1280x1024). The graphic was a little bit blurry.
		+	#When there is any dialog, I can’t click on Menu or somewhere else before the dialog disappears.
		+	#Sometimes when I use mouse scroll, the map is moving left-right instead of up-down. When I minimize the game window and open it again the problem disappears.
		+
		+	== Summary ==
		+
		+	“Heir to the Throne” is one very good campaign. It was very fun while I was playing it. It has great variety of scenarios with different scenario objectives. It’s very well made, has good storyline and well written dialogs. It has no major bugs or glitches - only small problems mentioned above. It’s not so difficult at all, only few levels hampered me. The campaign makes very good description to the world of Wesnoth and it’s very helpful for novice players.

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 #No changes.
 #No. Everything went right.
 == Scenario 5A: Muff Malal's Peninsula ==
@@ Line 68: / Line 67: @@
 #Scenario difficultly: 6.
 #Clear scenario objectives.
-#Good dialog. It could be good to be added text when the map is shown.
+#Good dialog. It could be good to be added some text when the map is shown.
 #It was a little bit hard because of the big number of enemy units.
 #Fun: 6. Nice scenario.
@@ Line 84: / Line 83: @@
 #I think the difficulty of this level could be lowered by decreasing number of enemy units. It’s only 6 scenario and it caused me bad headache.
 #Restarted many times because of hero’s death.
 == Scenario 7: Crossroads ==
@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 #Nothing to change, it’s very well made.
 #No events caused me to lose the game or reload the scenario.
 == Scenario 9: The Valley of Death ==
@@ Line 113: / Line 112: @@
 #Clear objectives – survive for 12 rounds.
 #Well written dialog.
-#No challenges with meeting objectives.
+#No challenges to meeting objectives.
 #Fun: 5.
 #No changes needed.
@@ Line 148: / Line 147: @@
 #No challenges to meeting objectives.  Good scenario for leveling up units.
 #Fun: 6.
-#I think the number of rounds is bigger than necessary. They could be lowered a bit.
+#I think the number of rounds is more than necessary. They could be lowered a bit.
 #No. Everything went right.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 17 December 2010
Line 117:		Line 117:
	#No changes needed.		#No changes needed.
	#One restart because of the mistake to forget keeping my hero alive.		#One restart because of the mistake to forget keeping my hero alive.
		+
		+	== Scenario 10: Gryphon Mountain ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 7
		+	#Clear scenario objectives.
		+	#Good dialog.
		+	#The main challenges were defeating Mother Gryphon and getting the eggs. Of course you can choose not to fight with her and to go straight to the enemy leader.
		+	#Fun: 8. Very fun scenario. It differs from the others.
		+	#No changes. Well made scenario.
		+	#No.
		+
		+	== Scenario 11: The Ford of Abez ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 3. Very easy scenario as the first one.
		+	#Clear scenario objectives. Just move ahead.
		+	#Dialog was good.
		+	#No challenges with objectives. It was easy to reach the flag. I don’t even lost a unit.
		+	#Fun: 5 - Good.
		+	#No changes.
		+	#No restarts.
		+
		+	== Scenario 12: Northern Winter ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 6.
		+	#Clear objectives.
		+	#No problems with dialog.
		+	#No challenges to meeting objectives. Good scenario for leveling up units.
		+	#Fun: 6.
		+	#I think the number of rounds is bigger than necessary. They could be lowered a bit.
		+	#No. Everything went right.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 12 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	(to be ~~filled out~~ by ~~playtester)~~	+	== Preamble ==
		+	Google Code-In 2010.
		+	This page shows the results of testing The Battle for Wesnoth 1.9.2 - campaign "Heir to the Throne" on Normal (Medium) difficulty.
		+	I followed the guidelines on [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting this page] for the analysis.
		+
		+	The following has been quoted from the page for reference purposes:
		+	<blockquote>
		+	#What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
		+	#How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
		+	#How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
		+	#How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
		+	#What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
		+	#How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
		+	#What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
		+	#Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
		+	#If you know a bit of the Wesnoth Markup Language - do you think that the WML of this scenario is clear and well commented? If not which part would you like to be documented better?
		+	</blockquote>
		+
		+	== Scenario 1: The Elves Besieged ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 2. Normal for first scenario in the campaign.
		+	#Clear scenario objectives.
		+	#The dialog makes very good introduction to the world of Wesnoth. The pictures in the beginning was very interesting.
		+	#No challenges to meeting objectives.
		+	#Fun: 5. Nice scenario.
		+	#Nothing to change.
		+	#No events caused me to lose the game or reload the scenario.
		+	#I don’t know nothing about WML so I can’t give a comment. In the scenarios below I will miss this point.
		+
		+	== Scenario 2: Blackwater Port ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 4. It’s one of the easy scenarios.
		+	#Clear scenario objectives.
		+	#Clear dialog. No mistakes.
		+	#No challenges to meeting objectives. It was easy.
		+	#Fun: 5. It’s very fun when you use hit and run tactic.
		+	#No changes.
		+	#None.
		+
		+	== Scenario 3: Isle of Alduin ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 4. Another easy scenario.
		+	#Clear scenario objectives.
		+	#Well written dialog.
		+	#No challenges to meeting objectives.
		+	#Fun: 6.
		+	#May be the number of villages could be lowered. I captured many of them and my gold rose very much. Finally I had 305 bonus gold for next level and I think this isn’t normal.
		+	#No events caused me to lose the game or reload the scenario.
		+
		+	== Scenario 4: Bay of Pearls ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 5
		+	#Clear scenario objectives. It’s good that you choice how to complete the objectives – to survive 24 rounds or to fight the two bosses.
		+	#Very nice dialog. I was intrigued by the question in the end. It’s great that you can choose thus your next scenario.
		+	#No challenges to meeting objectives. I defeated all bosses.
		+	#Fun: 6. Very good scenario.
		+	#No changes.
		+	#No. Everything went right.
		+
		+
		+	== Scenario 5A: Muff Malal's Peninsula ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 6.
		+	#Clear scenario objectives.
		+	#Good dialog. It could be good to be added text when the map is shown.
		+	#It was a little bit hard because of the big number of enemy units.
		+	#Fun: 6. Nice scenario.
		+	#No changes. Another well made scenario.
		+	#I restarted once because of hero’s death.
		+
		+	== Scenario 6: The Siege of Elensefar ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 7.
		+	#No problem with scenario objectives.
		+	#The dialog was fine.
		+	#There were big challenges to meeting objectives. I spent a lot of time in searching the right strategy. But finally I made it.
		+	#Fun: 5. It was hard and not so fun.
		+	#I think the difficulty of this level could be lowered by decreasing number of enemy units. It’s only 6 scenario and it caused me bad headache.
		+	#Restarted many times because of hero’s death.
		+	== Scenario 7: Crossroads ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 6. It’s better than previous one.
		+	#Clear objectives.
		+	#Clear but uninteresting. The ambush-warners worked well.
		+	#No challenges. Main thing is to be patient.
		+	#Fun: 6. Classic scenario.
		+	#No changes needed.
		+	#No problems.
		+
		+	== Scenario 8: The Princess of Wesnoth ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 4.
		+	#Crystal objectives.
		+	#Very interesting dialog.
		+	#Everything went right.
		+	#Fun: 7. The funniest scenario for now.
		+	#Nothing to change, it’s very well made.
		+	#No events caused me to lose the game or reload the scenario.
		+
		+
		+	== Scenario 9: The Valley of Death ==
		+
		+	#Campaign difficultly: Medium. Version: 1.9.2.
		+	#Scenario difficultly: 6.
		+	#Clear objectives – survive for 12 rounds.
		+	#Well written dialog.
		+	#No challenges with meeting objectives.
		+	#Fun: 5.
		+	#No changes needed.
		+	#One restart because of the mistake to forget keeping my hero alive.