GCI/Playtesting/An Orcish Incursion/Beginner - Revision history

Aethaeryn: categorizing

2011-03-06T02:58:01Z

categorizing

2010-12-15T02:22:26Z

‎Preamble: fx link

2010-11-25T05:46:00Z

‎Summary: adjust

2010-11-25T05:45:13Z

Testing completed

2010-11-25T05:25:03Z

‎Scenario 7: Showdown: m

2010-11-25T05:23:39Z

‎Scenario 7: Showdown: tested scenario 7

2010-11-25T04:55:13Z

‎Scenario 6: A Detour Through the Swamp: test results scenario 6

2010-11-25T04:49:51Z

2010-11-25T04:15:47Z

‎Scenario 5: Linaera the Quick: review of scenario 5

2010-11-24T06:35:21Z

‎Scenario 4: Valley of Trolls: finished scenario 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 6 March 2011
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Overall, I thought this campaign was very well made. The storyline was solid, the gameplay excellent, and there were no bugs or glitches. Aside from a few minor adjustments, the campaign is excellent and should not require change. "An Orcish Incursion" works well as one of the official campaigns. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 05:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)		Overall, I thought this campaign was very well made. The storyline was solid, the gameplay excellent, and there were no bugs or glitches. Aside from a few minor adjustments, the campaign is excellent and should not require change. "An Orcish Incursion" works well as one of the official campaigns. --[[User:S.Lee94\|S.Lee94]] 05:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	[[Category: GCI]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Preamble ==
-Google Code-In 2010: This page shows the results of testing "An Orcish Incursion" Campaign on Beginner (Easy) difficulty using Version 1.9.2. The analysis was done following the guidelines on [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting this page].
+Google Code-In 2010: This page shows the results of testing "An Orcish Incursion" Campaign on Beginner (Easy) difficulty using Version 1.9.2. The analysis was done following the guidelines on [[GCI/Playtesting|this page]].
 The following has been quoted from the page for reference purposes:

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 #The same missing events as scenario 5 and 6.
-=== Summary ===
+== Summary ==
 Overall, I thought this campaign was very well made. The storyline was solid, the gameplay excellent, and there were no bugs or glitches. Aside from a few minor adjustments, the campaign is excellent and should not require change. "An Orcish Incursion" works well as one of the official campaigns. --[[User:S.Lee94|S.Lee94]] 05:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-= WORK IN PROGRESS =
+== Preamble ==
-'''For reference:'''
+Google Code-In 2010: This page shows the results of testing "An Orcish Incursion" Campaign on Beginner (Easy) difficulty using Version 1.9.2. The analysis was done following the guidelines on [http://wiki.wesnoth.org/GCI/Playtesting this page].
 <blockquote>
 #What difficulty levels and what version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
@@ Line 97: / Line 99: @@
 #None.
 #The same missing events as scenario 5 and 6.

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 #Challenge level: 2.
 #Objectives were clear.
-#Good, concluded the scenario and fits well into the Wesnoth timeline.
+#Good, concluded the scenario and fitted well into the Wesnoth timeline. Although I thought it was a bit brief.
 #No challenges.
 #Fun: 6.

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 #Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
+#Challenge level: 4.
+#Objectives clear.
+#Average. Not much happened storylinewise.
+#The only challenge was keeping the mages alive, and even that wasn't too difficult.
+#Fun 5.
+#Nothing needs to be changed.
+#None.
+#Also seems to be missing events similar to scenario 5, but is otherwise fine.
 == Scenario 7: Showdown ==

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 #Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
+#Challenge level: 7.
+#Objectives were clear, as always.
+#Very good. The new character introduced was interesting.
+#The largest challenge seemed to be keeping characters alive. Linaera and the mages are especially prone to this if you try to attack quickly on the first day. The strategy I used to overcome this was to recruit a couple of elvish fighters as fodder and set up a defensive position on the starting island (forcing them to attack from the water), this allowed me to survive the first night with only minor losses.
+#Fun: 8. This is one of the better scenarios.
+#The difficulty could be lowered a bit by slightly raising the minimum starting gold; I didn't seem to have much left over from the previous scenario. Also, the hint about using scouts and Linaera in hit-and-run attacks didn't seem to be helpful and may be misleading. Perhaps it could be rephrased to be more informative such as "Hint: Linaera's power of teleportation allows her to move quickly between unoccupied controlled villages".
+#See challenges.
+#I may have missed it, but I don't see any events for Erlornas' death or turns running out. I only see the event for Linaera's death.
 == Scenario 6: A Detour Through the Swamp ==

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 #Difficulty: Beginner; Version 1.9.2.
+#Challenge level: 4.
+#Objectives were clear.
+#Average.
+#No significant challenges, actually. This might have been because I started this scenario with many units near level up.
+#Fun: 7.
+#No changes needed.
+#None
+#Code is good.
 == Scenario 5: Linaera the Quick ==